GERSZTEN v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE

Filing 150

VERDICT SLIP superseding all prior versions. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11-23-09. (nam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KRISTINA GERSZTEN, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE CANCER CENTERS, Defendant. VERDICT SLIP Civil Action No. 08-1280 Electronically Filed

1. Did the Plaintiff, Dr. Kristina Gerszten, prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Defendant, the Cancer Centers unlawfully discriminated against her on the basis of her sex when it failed to renew or renegotiate her 2007 Employment Agreement? ______ Yes ______ No

2. Did the Plaintiff, Dr. Kristina Gerszten, prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Cancer Centers unlawfully discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her sex when it failed to award her the St. Margaret Hospital/Natrona Heights Medical Director position? ______ Yes ______ No

3. Did the Plaintiff, Dr. Kristina Gerszten prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Cancer Centers unlawfully discriminated against her on the basis of her sex when it failed to award her the St. Margaret Hospital/Natrona Heights Staff Physician position? ______ Yes ______ No

4. Did the Plaintiff, Dr. Kristina Gerszten prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Cancer Centers unlawfully retaliated against her because she complained about sex discrimination, when it failed to renew or renegotiate her 2007 Employment Agreement? ______ Yes ______ No

5. Did the Plaintiff, Dr. Kristina Gerszten prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Cancer Centers unlawfully retaliated against her because she complained of sex discrimination when it failed to award her the St. Margaret Hospital/Natrona Heights Medical Director position? ______ Yes ______ No

6. Did the Plaintiff, Dr. Kristina Gerszten prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Cancer Centers unlawfully retaliated against her because she complained of sex discrimination when it failed to award her the St. Margaret Hospital/Natrona Heights Staff Physician position? ______ Yes ______ No

If you answered "No" to ALL of the above questions, please stop and notify the bailiff. If you answered "Yes" to any one (1) or more of the above questions, please proceed to question No. 7. 7. W hat are Plaintiff's total damages for compensatory damage including emotional distress, embarrassment, or humiliation (excluding back pay and front pay)? $__________________________. 8. W hat are the Plaintiff's total back pay damages? $___________________________.

9a.

W hat are Plaintiff's total front pay damages? $___________________________.

9b.

W hat are the number of years you believe plaintiff will continue to work after 2009? ____________________________.

9c.

W hat are plaintiff's total front pay damages for 2010 alone? __________________________.

10.

W hat is the amount of total punitive damages? $___________________________.

SO SAID BY ALL. Dated: ___________________

Signed by all jurors: _______________________________ ________________________________ Jury Foreperson _______________________________ ________________________________

_______________________________ ________________________________

_______________________________ ________________________________