UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCTION v. VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

Filing 774

ORDER Re: Parties' Objections to Exhibits for Invalidity Portion of Trial 752 . Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 4-2-12. (Moschetta, Nicole)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH OF
THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF
HIGHER EDUCATION d/b/a
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Plaintiff,
v.

VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No.: 2:08-cv-01307
Judge Arthur J. Schwab

FILED ELECTRONICALLY

ORDER OF COURT RE: PARTIES’ OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS
FOR INVALIDITY PORTION OF TRIAL

Presently before this Court is the Amended Combined Exhibit Chart for the Invalidity Trial,
which include their objections to exhibits’ authenticity and/or admissibility. Doc. No. 752.
After careful review of the exhibits and objections thereto, the Court rules as follows:
AND NOW, on this 2nd day of April 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant’s objections to the following Plaintiff’s exhibits are OVERRULED:







PPP-005 (provided a witness authenticates);
PPP-007 (provided a witness authenticates);
PPP-008 (provided a witness authenticates);
PPP-009 (provided a witness authenticates);
PPP-020-043; and
PPP-133a.

2. Defendant’s objection to the following Plaintiff’s Exhibits are SUSTAINED:




PP-072;
PPP-044;
PPP-131-133;

3. Plaintiff’s objections to the following Defendant’s exhibits are SUSTAINED:



















D-013;
D-016;
D-110-111;
D-115;
D-194;
D-196;
D-218;
D-218a;
D-219;
D-219a;
D-220;
DD-073;
DD-664;
DDD-001 (because PPP-129 includes DDD-001);
DDD-031;
DDD-054;
JT-027 (pages 01-278); and
JT-028.

4. Plaintiff’s objections to the following Defendant’s exhibits are OVERRULED:












D-050a;
D-050b;
D-051;
DDD-007;
DDD-021-023;
DDD-025-028;
DDD-030;
P-185;
P-199;
P-252; and
JT-027 (pages 279-504).

5. Defendant’s objection to the Plaintiff’s Exhibit PP-069 is OVERRULED AS MOOT
(pursuant to the parties’ stipulation).
6. Plaintiff’s objections to the following Defendant’s exhibits are SUSTAINED, pursuant to
the Court’s rulings on the motions in limine (doc. no. 741):



D-029-34;
D096;
2



















D-109;
D-112;
D-124;
D-126-127;
D-129;
D-132;
D-135-136;
D-139-141;
D-144-145;
D-147-149;
D-154-155;
D-171;
D-213-215;
DD-161;
DD-282;
DDD-032-053; and
DDD-055-065.
s/ Arthur J. Schwab
Arthur J. Schwab
United States District Judge

cc:

All Registered ECF Counsel and Parties

3