MCNEIL v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The above-captioned action against Defendants City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Bureau of Police-Department of Public Safety, and Nathan Harper is hereby dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 1/11/2012. (sps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Maurice McNeil, Plaintiff, vs. City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Bureau of Police – Department of Public Safety, Nathan Harper, Allegheny County, Dan Onorato, Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., Allegheny County District Attorney Detectives, Terrance O’Leary, Carl Schradder, William Friburger, Robert L. Kavals, Eric J. Harper, Wesley McClellan, Phillip Mercurio, Michael Horgan, James Stocker, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 09-825 AMBROSE, Senior District Judge MEMORANDUM ORDER OF COURT Plaintiff, Maurice McNeil (“McNeil” or “Plaintiff”), filed a Complaint against Defendants City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Bureau of Police – Department of Public Safety, Nathan Harper, Allegheny County, Dan Onorato, Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., Allegheny County District Attorney Detectives, Terrance O’Leary, Carl Schradder, William Friburger, Robert L. Kavals, Eric J. Harper, Wesley McClellan, Phillip Mercurio, Michael Horgan, and James Stocker, in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County on or about May 29, 2009. (Docket No. 1, Ex. A). On June 24, 2009, Defendants City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Bureau of Police – Department of Public Safety, and Nathan Harper (“City Defendants”) removed the case to this Court. (Docket No. 1). On July 6, 2009, the City Defendants filed an Answer to the Complaint and Affirmative Defenses. (Docket No. 2). 1 On October 31, 2011, Defendants City of Pittsburgh Police Officers, Carl Shradder (Carlos Shrader), William Friburger, Robert L. Kavals, Eric J. Harper (Harpster), and Phillip Mercurio (“Officer Defendants”), filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(5) arguing that Plaintiff failed to serve sufficient process on them. (Docket No. 3). At a status conference held in this case on November 7, 2011 (Docket No. 4), Plaintiff’s counsel agreed that the only service made was on the City Defendants. Plaintiff’s counsel also represented to the Court that he is currently unable to locate Plaintiff. Plaintiff did not file any response to the Motion to Dismiss. On November 21, 2011, I granted the Officer Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and dismissed the Officer Defendants from this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket No. 5). On that same date, I also issued an Order to Show Cause why Defendants Allegheny County, Dan Onorato, Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., Allegheny County District Attorney Detectives, Terrance O’Leary, Wesley McClellan, Michael Horgan, and James Stocker (“County Defendants”) should not be dismissed for failure to serve pursuant to Rule 4(m). (Docket No. 6). The Order to Show Cause directed Plaintiff to respond by November 29, 2011; however, Plaintiff failed to do so. On December 7, 2011, I entered an order dismissing the County Defendants from this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket No. 7). On December 9, 2011, I issued an Order to Show Cause why the City Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Docket No. 9). The Order to Show cause directed Plaintiff to respond by December 30, 2011; however, Plaintiff failed to do so. Plaintiff also failed to appear for his noticed deposition or otherwise participate in discovery. 2 Accordingly, this 11th day of January, 2012, it is ordered that the above-captioned action against Defendants City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Bureau of Police-Department of Public Safety, and Nathan Harper, is hereby dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. BY THE COURT: /s/ Donetta W. Ambrose Donetta W. Ambrose Senior U.S. District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?