RUSSO v. DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG et al

Filing 52

ORDER directing that, upon consideration of 51 Motion to Extend Time filed by CAITLIN RUSSO, the Court will refrain from ruling on the instant motion and in the interest of judicial economy, the Clerk of Court is to mark this case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED; Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this matter; Should new counsel enter their appearance on behalf of plaintiff, the Court will entertain a motion to reopen this matter and, if granted, the case will proceed in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 5/12/11. (map)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAITLIN RUSSO, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 09-1169 DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, Defendant. ORDER OF COURT The court record dated April granted leave to plaintiff was [document #49]. dated May 2, 14, in this 2011, withdraw given case reflects plaintiff's their thirty (30) Before the Court 'that previous appearance days to is a on by counsel her secure order behalf new of were and counsel letter from plaintiff, 2011, which the court will construe as a motion for extension of time to secure new counsel to represent her in this matter. Upon consideration of plaintiff's refrain from ruling on the outstanding motion. interest of Clerk of Court CLOSED. judicial economy, IT IS HEREBY is directed to mark this letter, we Instead, ORDERED will in the that the case ADMINISTRATIVELY Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this matter. Should new counsel enter their appearance on behalf of plaintiff, the Court will entertain a motion to reopen this matter and, if granted, the case will proceed in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. BY ~~7---------~------------------- Dated: May cc: I~, 2011 All Parties of Record ,C.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?