RUSSO v. DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG et al
Filing
52
ORDER directing that, upon consideration of 51 Motion to Extend Time filed by CAITLIN RUSSO, the Court will refrain from ruling on the instant motion and in the interest of judicial economy, the Clerk of Court is to mark this case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED; Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this matter; Should new counsel enter their appearance on behalf of plaintiff, the Court will entertain a motion to reopen this matter and, if granted, the case will proceed in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 5/12/11. (map)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAITLIN RUSSO,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 09-1169
DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG,
Defendant.
ORDER OF COURT
The
court
record
dated April
granted
leave
to
plaintiff
was
[document
#49].
dated May 2,
14,
in
this
2011,
withdraw
given
case
reflects
plaintiff's
their
thirty
(30)
Before the Court
'that
previous
appearance
days
to
is a
on
by
counsel
her
secure
order
behalf
new
of
were
and
counsel
letter from plaintiff,
2011, which the court will construe as a motion for
extension of time to secure new counsel to represent her in this
matter.
Upon
consideration
of
plaintiff's
refrain from ruling on the outstanding motion.
interest
of
Clerk of
Court
CLOSED.
judicial
economy,
IT
IS
HEREBY
is directed to mark this
letter,
we
Instead,
ORDERED
will
in the
that
the
case ADMINISTRATIVELY
Nothing contained in this order shall be considered
a dismissal or disposition of this matter.
Should new counsel
enter their appearance on behalf of plaintiff, the Court will
entertain a motion to reopen this matter and,
if granted, the
case will proceed in the same manner as if this order had not
been entered.
BY
~~7---------~-------------------
Dated: May
cc:
I~, 2011
All Parties of Record
,C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?