ARMSTRONG HOLDINGS, INC. v. ARMSTRONG BLUE SKY PARTNERS, L.P. et al
ORDER remanding case to Court of Common Pleas of Butler County, Pennsylvania. Clerk is to mark CASE CLOSED.. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 2/11/10. (mh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
A R M S T R O N G HOLDINGS, INC. a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v ARM S T R O N G BLUE SKY PARTNERS, L.P. a North Carolina limited partnership, ABS-LOFTS D I L W O R T H , L.L.C. a North Carolina limited liability company, ABS-2525 S O U T H , L.L.C. a North Carolina limited liability company and ABS-2334 S O U T H BOULEVARD, L.L.C. a North Carolina limited liability company Defendants.
) ) ) ) 2:10-cv-122 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ORDER OF COURT On January 27, 2010, Defendants filed a Notice of Removal from the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County, Pennsylvania. The averments contained in the Notice of Removal and in the underlying complaint were not sufficient to establish complete diversity of citizenship jurisdiction because the citizenship of each of the members of the Limited Liability Companies ("LLCs") had not been disclosed. As explained recently by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Zambelli Fireworks Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Wood, 2010 WL 143682 * 7 (3d Cir. 2010): the citizenship of partnerships and other unincorporated associations is determined by the citizenship of its partners or members. Swiger, 540 F.3d at 182. Accordingly, the citizenship of an LLC is determined by the citizenship of its members. And as with partnerships, where an LLC has, as one of its members, another LLC, "the citizenship of unincorporated associations must be traced through however many layers of partners or members there may be" to determine the citizenship of the LLC. It is incumbent upon federal courts to verify their authority to hear a dispute at all stages of the case. Accordingly, on January 29, 2010, the Court entered an order that required Defendants to submit proof that there is complete diversity of citizenship among the parties such
that this Court may exercise subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1446. On February 10, 2010, Defendants filed a Response which indicated that complete diversity of citizenship cannot be established under the standard set forth in Zambelli. Accordingly, Defendants recognize that this case is subject to remand.
AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is hereby REMANDED FORTHWITH to the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County, Pennsylvania The clerk shall docket this case closed.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Terrence F. McVerry United States District Court Judge
Eric S. Newman Email: email@example.com Fridrikh V. Shrayber, Esquire Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Kerrin M. Kowach Email: email@example.com Mark A. Eck, Esquire Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?