MORT et al v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES et al

Filing 52

BRIEF in Support re 51 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by ELIZABETH MORT, ALEX RODRIGUEZ. (Dodge, Patricia)

Download PDF
901586.1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH MORT and ALEX RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-01.438-DSC LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES; LAWRENCE COUNTY; CHRISSY MONTAGUE, Lawrence County Children and. Youth Services Caseworker; and JAMESON HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., Defendants. Plaintiffs Elizabeth Mort and Alex Rodriguez ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned. counsel, submit this Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed. R Civ. Pro. For the reasons that follow, this Court should grant the Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint {"Motion"). L INTRODUCTION On October 28, 2010, the Plaintiffs filed afour-count Complaint against Defendants Lawrence County Children and Youth Services, Chrissy Montague and Jameson Health System, Inc. ("Jameson") On December 1, 2010, the Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint adding Defendant Lawrence County. On December 30, 2010, Jameson filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. On January 17, 2011, Defendants Lawrence County, Lawrence County Children and Youth Services {collectively referred to as "LCCYS") and Chrissy 901586.1 Montague (collectively referred to as the "Lawrence County Defendants") also filed a Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. After briefing by the parties, on August 31, 2011, this Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss.l On October 10, 2011, the Defendants filed Answers to the Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. Pursuant to the Court's August 3, 2011 Order, the deadline to amend the pleadings and/or add new parties is October 22, 2011.2 A. The Facts and Issues Raised in the Amended Complaint as Filed. As currently filed, the Amended Complaint states claims for violation of the PlainrifFs' Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process against the Lawrence County Defendants (Count I) and conspiracy to violate Plaintiffs' civil rights against all Defendants {Count II). In discovery, the parties have exchanged Rule 2b(a) Disclosures and the Plaintiffs have served the Defendants with Requests for Production of Documents. Tile Plaintiffs have also obtained additional information through their deposition of Defendant Montague. B. The Proposed Amendment. Based on additional information learned during discovery, the Plaintiffs seek to amend their Amended Complaint to add two additional Defendants: Lawrence County Children and Youth Services ("CYS") Director Jane Gajda ("Ms. Gajda") and Intake Supervisor Sandy Copper ("Ms. Copper"). Specifically, during the course of discovery it has become evident that Ms. Gajda, as the Director of CYS, is responsible for implementing and approving CYS's ~ The Court's Order dismissed the Plaintiffs' claims for negligence (Count III) and invasion of privacy (Count IV) against Jameson. 2 Because the deadline falls on a weekend, it is extended to the first day the Clerk's Office is accessible or Monday, October 24, 2011. See Rule 6(a)(3), Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 901586.1 policies and practices, including the policy at issue in this case. Therefore, the Plaintiffs seek leave to amend the Amended Complaint to add Ms. Gajda as a defendant to CountsIand II. Additionally, it has been uncovered that Ms. Copper was the individual notified by Jameson that Plaintiff Elizabeth Mort's ("Plaintiff Mort") confirmation test results were positive for opiates. Further, it has been discovered that it was at the instruction of Ms. Copper that Defendant Montague sought a court order on April 30, 2010, permitting CYS to take baby Isabella Rodriguez into emergency protective custody solely on the basis of Jameson's report to Defendant Copper that Plaintiff Mort had tested positive for opiates. As a result, the Plaintiffs also seek leave to amend their Amended Complaint to add Ms. Copper as a defendant to CountsI and II. •. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15{a), leave to amend "shall be freely given when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Moreover, the Third Circuit has noted that courts should exercise "strong liberality" in allowing amendments under Rule 15(a), Heyl & Pattefson Intl, Inc. v. D.F. Rich Housing, 663 F.2d 419, 425 (3d Cir. 1981), and has "held consistently that leave to amend should be freely granted." Dole v. Arco Chemical Co., 921 F.2d 484, 486 (3d Cir. 1990). Given this standard, the procedural posture of the case, and the amendment. sought, the Plaintiffs request that their motion be granted. The proposed amendment will not result in any prejudice to any party and will not unduly delay this case. There is still ample time left for discovery in this case, as the Plaintiffs intend to file a motion to extend the deadline to conduct discovery shortly. Further, the two additional Defendants had notice of the claims in this case as employees of ozie of the originally named Defendants, CYS. Finally, the amendment has been made within the tune allowed for -3- 9015$6.1 amendments in this case and would not result in either "substantial" prejudice to the Defendants or unduly delay the case. III. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Plaintiffs respectfully request that their Motion for Leave to Amend be granted and that they be permitted to file an Amended Complaint substantially in the form of Exhibit 1 attached to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. MEYER, UNKOVIC &SCOTT LLP By: /s/Patricia ~. Dod~-e Patricia L. Dodge PA ID No. 35393 Antoinette Oliver PA ID No. 206148 535 Smithfield Street Suite 1300 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2315 (412) 456-2800 pld@muslaw.com aco@muslaw.com By: /s/ Sara J. Rose Sara J. Rose PA ID No. 20493 b Witold J. Walczak PA ID No. 62976 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES FOLINDATION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 13 Atwood Street Pittsburgh, PA 15213 {412) 681-7864 srose@aclupa.org vwalczak@aclupa.org 9015$6.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint was served this 24t1i day of October, 2011, via the Court's electronic transmission facilities pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(3) and Local Rule 5.5 upon the following: John C. Conti, Esquire Richard J. Kabbert, Esquire Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote Two PPG Place, Suite 400 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 (Counselfog Defendant Jameson Health System, Inc.) Marie Milie Jones, Esquire Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek &Eck, P.L.L.C. U.S. Steel Tower, Suite 4850 600 Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219 (Counselfor° Defendants ~cawrence County, Lawrence County Children and Youth SeiAvices and Chrissy Montague) $y: /s/Patricia L. Dodge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?