KOGER v. ALLEGHENY INTERMEDIATE UNIT et al

Filing 64

ORDER denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration and to Compel Production of Documents. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 7/5/11. (map)

S1Ni~ f'~!!9 STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Todd Elliott Koger
Plaintiff,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
vs.

Civil Action No. 10-1466

Allegheny Intermediate Unit,

iI!'!: 1mB

Duquesne City Education Association,
Duquesne City School District, and

~~
nty 01

-~ ~W~~I'ISmmEh
______
ORDERED rHA'l' THE IImII
IOfI
IS DDlED ..

L...

c:::

Pennsylvania State Education Association,
Barbara McDonnell, Mary Beth Colvill,
Daniel Carey, and Stanley Whiteman,
Defendants.
(COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS)MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
AND NOW, PLAINTIFF, TODD ELLIOTT KOGER, PRO SE, FILES THE FORGOING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERA TION AND/OR TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS.

ON JUNE

17,2011, BY MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF COURT, THIS COURT DECIDED NOT

TO ENFORCE THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF SUBPOENAS STATING "THE
NOVEMBER

12,2010, SUBPOENAS WASN'T ATTACHED TO THE MOTION TO INDICATE TO WHOM THE

SUBPOENAS WAS DIRECTED, NOR ON WHOM THEY WERE SERVED."
NOVEMBER

INTERESTINGLY, THE

12,2010, SUBPOENAS WAS ALREADY A PART OF THE RECORD.

THAT IS, THIS COURT HAD ORIGINALLY ISSUED A STAY IN

2010 TO PROTECT THE

DEFENDANTS FROM ITS RESPONSIBILITY UNDER LA W AS IT APPLIED TO PLAINTIFF'S SUBPOENAS
ATTACHED TO THEIR MOTION.
NONETHELESS, PLAlNTIFF HAS DEVELOPED A RECORD FROM THE DEFENDANTS' OWN