ORTIZ v. BAIRD et al

Filing 52

ORDER adopting 50 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of this Court and granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; Parties advised of appellate rights. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/26/13. (map)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ISMAEL ACEVEDO ORTIZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No.1 0-1753 ) Chief District Judge Gary L. Lancaster/ ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly vs. DANIEL JEROME BAIRD, VINCENT PAUL KAL WASINSKI, ERNEST BORING, SCOTT JOHN DAIS LEY, KELLY LATTERNER, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3, JOHN DOE #4, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER AND NOW, this 26 th day of March" 2013, after the Plaintiff, Ismael Acevedo Ortiz, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 43] was filed by Defendants, and aftl;:r a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until March 4, 2013, and by extension until March 25,2013, to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Sumnary Judgment [ECF No. 43] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 41:a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days. IJ~J ~ON. GARY L. LANC-A-ST-E-R-----­ Chief United States Disuict Judge cc: Honorable Maureen P. Kelly United States Magistrate Judge Ismael Acevedo Ortiz FY-3422 SCI-Frackville 1111 Altamont Boulevard Frackville, PA 17931 All Counsel of Record by electronic fili.ng

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?