FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D.C. v. TYCO THERMAL CONTROLS, LLC et al

Filing 43

ORDER granting 42 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 24 Motion to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings, as set forth in the attached document. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's right to re-assert any and all claims asserted hereunder in the appropriate state court forum. Third Party Plaintiff's Third Party Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Third Party Plaintiff's right to re-assert any and all claims asserted hereunder in the appropriate state court forum. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/13/2012. (rtt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D.C., as subrogee of 3E TRADING, LLC Plaintiff, v. TYCO THERMAL CONTROLS, LLC, et al., Defendants, v. 39TH STREET COMMONS, LLC, et al., Third Party Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 11-179 Judge Cathy Bissoon MEMORANDUM ORDER In response to the Court’s request for briefing as to whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, Plaintiff Firemen’s Insurance Company of Washington, D.C. conceded lack of subject matter jurisdiction and filed a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 42). Because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff Firemen’s Insurance Company of Washington, D.C.’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 42) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s right to re-assert any and all claims asserted hereunder in the appropriate state court forum. Because there is no independent basis for this Court to assert jurisdiction over Third Party Plaintiff Mickey J. Hastings’s Third Party Complaint (Doc. 30), and Third Party Plaintiff Hastings has not alleged any basis for subject matter jurisdiction, see 3d Party Compl. (Doc. 30), 1 Third Party Plaintiff Hastings’s Third Party Complaint likewise is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Third Party Plaintiff’s right to re-assert any and all claims asserted hereunder in the appropriate state court forum. Defendant Hastings’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings (Doc. 24) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge January 13, 2012 cc (via e-mail): All counsel of record. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?