INMAN v. TECHNICOLOR SA et al

Filing 101

ORDER granting 93 Motion to Substitute Party; Plaintiff's Complaint and all other pleadings already filed in this lawsuit are amended to reflect PM of AMERICA, as the named defendant in this lawsuit in place of SVETLANA; As agreed by plaintiff and counsel for PM of AMERICA, upon the granting of this motion, plaintiff is to effectuate service on PM of AMERICA through its counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 7/6/11. (map)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RYAN C. INMAN,

CIV[L ACTION

Plaintiff

v.
TECHNICOLOR USA, INC., el al.,
Defendants

AND NOW, this

£

No.2: J I-CV-00666-0LL
ORDER

day of

J......-LJ.

, 2011, upon consideration of the

Motion of plaintiff, Ryan C. Inman, requesting entry of an order substituting PM of America, as
the defendant in this lawsuit in place of Svetlana, IT IS ORDERED that this Motion is
GRANTED and that plaintiffs Complaint and all other pleadings or papers already filed in this

lawsuit as of this date are amended to reflect PM of America, as the named defendant in this
lawsuit in place of Svetlana. Further, the Clerk of this Court is directed to amend the docket for
this case to reflect PM of America, as the named defendant in this lawsuit in place ofSvetlana.
Further, as agreed by Plaintiff and counsel for PM of America, upon the granting of this
Order, Plaintiff is to effectuate service on PM of America through counsel for PM of America.

U.S.DJ.

3