MAIR v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
Filing
11
ORDER that the instant 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's 10 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/27/2011. A copy of this Order was mailed to Petitioner at his address of record. (dad)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TERRANCE MAIR,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY of
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, et al.
Respondents.
Civil No. 11-923
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2011, after the
Petitioner, Terrance Mair, filed a petition for writ of habeas
corpus, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the
United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties fourteen days
after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto,
and no objections having been filed, and upon written review of the
petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate
Judge=s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 10), which is adopted
as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas
corpus filed by Petitioner (Docket No. 6) is dismissed and a
certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of
the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the Petitioner desires
to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by
filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P .
s/Cathy Bissoon
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?