BOND v. HORNE et al

Filing 127

ORDER granting 89 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 93 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 93 Plaintiff's Partial Motion and 108 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment; overruling 122 plaintiff's objections and adopting 121 its Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed on April 14, 2015, as augmented in the memorandum opinion issued on this date as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 8/14/15. (kak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JESSE DERRICK BOND,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID HORNE, et al.
Defendants.

2:11cv1342
Electronic Filing

ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum
Opinion filed on this date, IT IS ORDERED that [89] Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED and [93] Plaintiff’s Partial Motion and [108]
Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment be, and the same hereby are, DENIED. Plaintiff's
objections are overruled. The magistrate judge's [121] Report and Recommendation filed on
April 14, 2015, as augmented in the memorandum opinion issued on this date is adopted as the
opinion of the Court. Remaining for trial is a retaliation claim against Defendant Horne for
filing the August 23, 2010, misconduct report.1
s/David Stewart Cercone
David Stewart Cercone
United States District Judge
cc:

JESSE DERRICK BOND
BZ-2493
Box 244
Graterford, PA 19426-0244
(via U.S. First Class Mail)
Robert A. Willig
Office of Attorney General
(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)

1 The Report and Recommendation mistakenly states that the misconduct report was issued on
August 20, 2010.