PRICE v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations. Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 11/15/2013. (kly)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SETH WAYNE PRICE, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 11 – 1391 District Judge Terrence F. McVerry Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Lenihan on October 18, 2013. The magistrate judge recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied in part and dismissed as moot in part. The parties were served with the Report and Recommendation and informed that they had until November 4, 2013, to file written objections. As of the date of this order no objections have been filed. Therefore, after de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered. AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED in part and DISMISSED as moot in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated October 18, 2013, (ECF No. 15), is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. By the Court: s/Terrence F. McVerry United States District Judge cc: Seth Wayne Price FS4719 165 SCI Lane Greensburg, PA 15601 (Via First Class Mail) Counsel of Record (Via ECF Electronic Mail) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?