PRICE v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations. Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 11/15/2013. (kly)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SETH WAYNE PRICE,
Petitioner,
v.
JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ and
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF
PROBATION & PAROLE,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 11 – 1391
District Judge Terrence F. McVerry
Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by Chief Magistrate
Judge Lenihan on October 18, 2013. The magistrate judge recommended that the Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied in part and dismissed as moot in part. The parties were served
with the Report and Recommendation and informed that they had until November 4, 2013, to file
written objections. As of the date of this order no objections have been filed. Therefore, after de
novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and
Recommendation, the following order is entered.
AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2013,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is
DENIED in part and DISMISSED as moot in part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated October 18,
2013, (ECF No. 15), is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules
of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by
Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
By the Court:
s/Terrence F. McVerry
United States District Judge
cc: Seth Wayne Price
FS4719
165 SCI Lane
Greensburg, PA 15601
(Via First Class Mail)
Counsel of Record
(Via ECF Electronic Mail)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?