THOMAS v. WALTON et al

Filing 43

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 39 Report and Recommendations and granting 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 5/29/2013. (kly)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEFFROW THOMAS, ) ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 12-41 ) Judge Terrence F. McVerry/ MR. JOHN WALTON, Warden; MR. ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly STEVEN CMAR, Deputy Warden; MR. ) BILL NICHOLSON, Medical Supervisor; ) MR. MIKE KUSMA, Physician Assistant; ) MS. GAIL GASKILL, Nurse, ) Defendants. ) Plaintiff, ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2013, after the Plaintiff Jeffrow Thomas, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim and granting the parties until May 28, 2013, to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by Plaintiff, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss submitted on behalf of Defendants, ECF No. 26, is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days BY THE COURT: /s/ Terrence F. McVerry Terrence F. McVerry United States District Judge cc: Honorable Maureen P. Kelly United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrow Thomas 115 East 11th Avenue Homestead, PA 15120 All Counsel of Record Via CM-ECF 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?