HAIRSTON v. FOLINO et al

Filing 10

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 5 as the opinion of the Court; that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner 4 is dismissed and a certificate of appealability is denied; that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the Petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/4/12. (jg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTR:.:CT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PB:NNSYLVANIA KENNETH HAIRSTON, Petitioner, v. LOUIS FOLINO, civil ~~tion No. 12-313 et al. Respondents ORDER AND Petitioner, NOW, Kenneth habeas corpus, by the days objections 4~ Hairston, and after a United fourteen this States :h,.. , L. filed a and :3.fter 2012, , petition for 'ilJTit the of Report and RE!COmmendation was filed Magistrate after being thereto, of day Judge granting the parties served with a copy to file written upon consideration of the <)b]ections filed by the petitioner, and upon written review of thf:! petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrai.:E! Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No.5) I which is c.do:?ted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS ORDERED that corpus filed by Petitioner the petition for (Docket No. writ of habeas is dismis:3ed and a FURTHER ORDERED that pu:::-suant to Rule 4 (a) (1: q,) certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the Petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so wit:-lir:. thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. ~I~~ United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?