HAIRSTON v. FOLINO et al
Filing
10
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 5 as the opinion of the Court; that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner 4 is dismissed and a certificate of appealability is denied; that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the Petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/4/12. (jg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTR:.:CT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PB:NNSYLVANIA
KENNETH HAIRSTON,
Petitioner,
v.
LOUIS FOLINO,
civil
~~tion
No. 12-313
et al.
Respondents
ORDER
AND
Petitioner,
NOW,
Kenneth
habeas corpus,
by
the
days
objections
4~
Hairston,
and after a
United
fourteen
this
States
:h,.. , L.
filed
a
and
:3.fter
2012,
,
petition
for
'ilJTit
the
of
Report and RE!COmmendation was filed
Magistrate
after being
thereto,
of
day
Judge
granting
the
parties
served with a
copy to
file
written
upon
consideration
of
the
<)b]ections
filed by the petitioner, and upon written review of thf:! petition
and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrai.:E! Judge's
Report
and Recommendation
(Docket No.5)
I
which is
c.do:?ted as
the opinion of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED that
corpus
filed
by
Petitioner
the petition for
(Docket
No.
writ
of
habeas
is
dismis:3ed and a
FURTHER ORDERED that pu:::-suant
to Rule 4 (a) (1:
q,)
certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS
of
the
Federal Rules
of Appellate
Procedure
if
the
Petitioner
desires to appeal from this Order he must do so wit:-lir:. thirty
(30)
days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3,
Fed. R. App. P.
~I~~
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?