MAZUR v. MILO'S KITCHEN, LLC et al
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 68 & 70 ) are GRANTED regarding Plaintiffs' Funke and Ruff's claims for unjust enrichment, but, otherwise, the Motions are DENIED. The Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Kelly dated 2/11/14 (Docs. 136 & 137 ) hereby are adopted as the Opinions of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/25/14. (dcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE MILO'S DOG TREATS
CONSOLIDATED CASES
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 12-1011
Judge Cathy Bissoon
Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
MEMORANDUM ORDER
On August 13, 2012, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P.
Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.
§§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C, 72.D and 72.G of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
On February 11, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued two Reports (Docs. 136 & 137),
recommending that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 68 & 70) regarding Plaintiffs Funke
and Ruff, respectively, be granted as to Plaintiffs’ claims for unjust enrichment, but otherwise
denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and Defendants have filed
Objections. See Docs. 139-142.
After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the
Reports and Recommendations and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:
Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 68 & 70) are GRANTED regarding Plaintiffs’
Funke and Ruff’s claims for unjust enrichment, but, otherwise, the Motions are DENIED.
The Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Kelly dated February 11, 2014 hereby
are adopted as the Opinions of the District Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 25, 2014
s\Cathy Bissoon
Cathy Bissoon
United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification):
All counsel of record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?