BRADLEY v. SAUERS et al
Filing
34
ORDER dismissing 26 Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6); and adopting 33 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 07/26/16. (mcp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID MICHAEL BRADLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT DEBRA SAUERS,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:12-cv-1218
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2016, after Plaintiff filed a Motion for Relief Pursuant to
Rule 60(b)(6) (ECF No. 26) in the above-captioned case, and after response to said motion was
submitted by the defendants (ECF No. 31), and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the
United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to
file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of
the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 33), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, it is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6)
filed by the petitioner (ECF No. 26) is DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30)
days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
BY THE COURT:
s/Terrence F. McVerry
Senior United States District Judge
cc:
Ronald M. Wabby, Jr., Esq.
David Michael Bradley
GS-4862
SCI Forest
PO Box 945
Marienville, PA 16239
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?