BRADLEY v. SAUERS et al

Filing 34

ORDER dismissing 26 Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6); and adopting 33 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 07/26/16. (mcp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID MICHAEL BRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT DEBRA SAUERS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:12-cv-1218 ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2016, after Plaintiff filed a Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) (ECF No. 26) in the above-captioned case, and after response to said motion was submitted by the defendants (ECF No. 31), and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 33), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) filed by the petitioner (ECF No. 26) is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. BY THE COURT: s/Terrence F. McVerry Senior United States District Judge cc: Ronald M. Wabby, Jr., Esq. David Michael Bradley GS-4862 SCI Forest PO Box 945 Marienville, PA 16239

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?