STILLWAGON v. ASTRUE

Filing 17

ORDER denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 13 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Alan N. Bloch on 3/19/2013. (kmw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RICHARD OWEN STILLWAGON, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 12-1460 MICHAEL J. AS TRUE , COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. o R D E R AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2013, upon consideration of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court, upon review of the Commissioner of Social Security's final decision, denying plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits under Subchapter II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §401, et seq., and denying plaintiff's claim for supplemental security income benefits under Subchapter XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §1381, et seq., finds that the Commissioner's findings are supported by substantial evidence and, accordingly, affirms. v. Secretary of U.S. Departl11~~nt See 42 U.S.C. §405{g); Jesurum of Health & Human Services, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995); Williams v. Sullivan, 970 F.2d 1178, 1182 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied sub nom., 507 U.S. 924 (1993) Bowen, 845 F. 2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988). 1 i Brown v. See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D. Pa. 1990) (if supported by substantial evidence, the Commissioner's decision must be affirmed, as a federal court may neither reweigh the evidence, nor reverse, merely because it would have decided the claim differently) (citing Cotter v. Harris, 642 F.2d 700, 705 (3d Cir. 1981)). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (document No. 11) is DENIED and defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (document No. 13) is GRANTED. s/Alan N. Bloch United States District Judge ecf: Counsel of record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?