TEMPLE v. GEROULO et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 10 . This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kelly dated 12/17/12 is hereby adopted as the opinion of the District Court. A copy of this Memorandum Order has been sent today to the Plaintiff's address of record. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/13/13. (dcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DION A. TEMPLE, Plaintiff, v. VITO P. GEROULO, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 12-1477 Judge Cathy Bissoon Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly MEMORANDUM ORDER On December 13, 2012, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On December 17, 2012, the magistrate judge issued a Report (Doc. 10) recommending that this case be dismissed, under the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on Plaintiff, and no objections have been filed. After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered: This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kelly dated December 17, 2012 is hereby adopted as the opinion of the District Court. February 13, 2013 s\Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via first-class U.S. mail): Dion A. Temple HF-5212 SCI Fayette Box 9999 LaBelle, PA 15719 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?