WHITNEY v. WETZEL et al
Filing
109
ORDER granting 73 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 102 Report and Recommendations. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 73 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 77 ) is DENIED.It is further ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 102 ) dated July 6, 2015, is ADOPTED, as the opinion of the Court, as supplemented by the memorandum opinion accompanying this order. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/12/2015. (smc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES WHITNEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN E. WETZEL, et al.,
Defendants.
) Civil Action No. 2: 12-cv-01623
)
) Chief United States District Judge
) Joy Flowers Conti
)
)
)
)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
DECREED that for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 73) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Motion
for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 77) is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 102) dated July
6, 2015, is ADOPTED, as the opinion of the Court, as supplemented by the memorandum
opinion accompanying this order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joy Flowers Conti
Joy Flowers Conti
Chief, United States District Judge
cc:
CHARLES WHITNEY
DM 3996
SCI Benner
301 Institution Drive
Bellefonte, PA 16823
(via United States First Class Mail)
Yana L. Warshafsky
Office of the Attorney General
(via ECF electronic notification)
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?