DOUGLAS v. BARRONE et al
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM ORDER dismissing action for failure to prosecute and adopting 26 Report and Recommendation of Judge Kelly as the Opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 8/7/13. (njt)
DOUGLAS v. BARRONE et al
Doc. 27
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRlCT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RlCKY DOUGLAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
OFFICER BARRONE, Doc; OFFICER 1.
KELLY; CAPTAIN STANTE; DEPITY
ENERICK; WARDEN STICKMAN,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:12cv1706
Electronic Filing
Judge David Stewart Cercone
Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
MEMORANDUM ORDER
AND NOW, this
1~day of ~
, 2013, after the Plaintiff, Ricky
Douglas, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation
(ECF 29) was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until July 29, 2013,
to file written objections thereto, and Plaintiffs copy of the Report and Recommendation having
been returned to the Court by Allegheny County Jail, and upon independent review of the record ,
and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted
as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint filed in this case [ECF 9], is
dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules
of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as
provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court,
at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days.
DAVID STEWART CERCONE
United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
cc:
Honorable Maureen P. Kelly
Virginia Spencer Scott, Esquire
(Via CMlECF Electronic Mail)
Ricky Douglas
Pod Number 164550
Allegheny County Jail
950 Second A venue
Pittsburgh, PA 15219-3100
(Via First Class Mail)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?