GEARHART v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Filing 16

ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that 13 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Kelly's 15 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 11/13/13. (bdb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBIN M. GEARHART, ) ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 12-1828 ) Judge Mark R. Hornak ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of ) Social Security Administration, ) Defendant. ) Plaintiff, ORDER AND NOW, this 13 th day of November, 2013, after the Plaintiff, Robin M. Gearhart, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 10] & [ECF No. 13] were filed by the parties, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until November 1, 2013, to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff [ECF No. 10] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant [ECF No. 13] is granted. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days. United States District Judge cc: Honorable Maureen P. Kelly United States Magistrate Judge All Counsel of Record Via CM-ECF 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?