ENDEAVOR ENERGY RESOURCES, L.P. v. GATTO & REITZ, LLC

Filing 148

MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 121 plaintiff's motion to compel re: request(s) for admission as to website. Defendant Gatto & Reitz shall answer the request(s) without delay. All as more fully set forth in the Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 2/23/17. (mwm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ENDEAVOR ENERGY RESOURCES, L.P., a Texas Limited Partnership, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GATTO & REITZ, LLC, a Pennsylvania ) Limited Liability Company, ) ) Defendant / ) Third Party Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RIDEC, INC., MARCELLUS ) MINERAL GROUP, LLC and ) JAMES C. ELLIS, ) ) Third Party Defendants. ) 2:13cv542 Electronic Filing MEMORANDUM ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2017, upon due consideration of plaintiff's motion to compel re: request(s) for admission as to website and the parties' submissions in conjunction therewith, IT IS ORDERED that [121] plaintiff's motion to compel be, and the same hereby is, granted. Defendant Gatto & Reitz shall answer the request(s) without delay. The ultimate issues pertaining to admissibility at trial are beyond the scope of the inquiry raised by plaintiff's motion. And although the "relevancy" for the purpose of discovery is not particularly great, the relative access to the information, ease with which the information may be verified and expense of complying with the request do not place the discovery beyond the proper bounds of inquiry. s/David Stewart Cercone David Stewart Cercone United States District Judge cc: Denise D. Pentino, Esquire William E. Robinson, Esquire Randal M. Whitlach, Esquire Nicholas J. Godfrey, Esquire Dennis J. Roman, Esquire Timothy R. Stienstraw, Esquire Charlene S. Seibert, Esquire Harry F. Kunselman, Esquire Trent A. Echard, Esquire Joseph M. George, Esquire Christopher L. Blackwell, Esquire (Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?