ENDEAVOR ENERGY RESOURCES, L.P. v. GATTO & REITZ, LLC
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 121 plaintiff's motion to compel re: request(s) for admission as to website. Defendant Gatto & Reitz shall answer the request(s) without delay. All as more fully set forth in the Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 2/23/17. (mwm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ENDEAVOR ENERGY RESOURCES,
L.P., a Texas Limited Partnership,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GATTO & REITZ, LLC, a Pennsylvania )
Limited Liability Company,
)
)
Defendant /
)
Third Party Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
RIDEC, INC., MARCELLUS
)
MINERAL GROUP, LLC and
)
JAMES C. ELLIS,
)
)
Third Party Defendants.
)
2:13cv542
Electronic Filing
MEMORANDUM ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2017, upon due consideration of plaintiff's motion
to compel re: request(s) for admission as to website and the parties' submissions in conjunction
therewith, IT IS ORDERED that [121] plaintiff's motion to compel be, and the same hereby is,
granted. Defendant Gatto & Reitz shall answer the request(s) without delay.
The ultimate issues pertaining to admissibility at trial are beyond the scope of the inquiry
raised by plaintiff's motion. And although the "relevancy" for the purpose of discovery is not
particularly great, the relative access to the information, ease with which the information may be
verified and expense of complying with the request do not place the discovery beyond the proper
bounds of inquiry.
s/David Stewart Cercone
David Stewart Cercone
United States District Judge
cc:
Denise D. Pentino, Esquire
William E. Robinson, Esquire
Randal M. Whitlach, Esquire
Nicholas J. Godfrey, Esquire
Dennis J. Roman, Esquire
Timothy R. Stienstraw, Esquire
Charlene S. Seibert, Esquire
Harry F. Kunselman, Esquire
Trent A. Echard, Esquire
Joseph M. George, Esquire
Christopher L. Blackwell, Esquire
(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?