KRAMER v. THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON et al

Filing 71

Order adopting Report and Recommendations re 70 Report and Recommendations as the Opinion of the Court; ORDER denying 65 Motion for Injunctive Relief. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/27/2014. (smc )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL KRAMER,
Plaintiff,

)
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
)
THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON; THE )
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPT.;
)
ANTHONY GRILLO, in their individual )
Capacities; RUSSELL BAKER, in their
)
Individual and official capacities;
)
GARY SCHUBERT, in their individual and )
official capacities; WILLIAM WEBER,
)
Arnold Police Dept.; in their individual and )
official capacities; ARNOLD POLICE
)
DEPT.,
)
Defendants.
)

Civil Action No. 13-606
District Judge Joy Flowers Conti
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy

Re: ECF No. 70

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On April 29, 2013, the above captioned case was filed in this Court and was
referred to a Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate
Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court
for Magistrate Judges.
On August 19, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy issued
her Report and Recommendation in which she recommended denial of Plaintiff’s motion
for injunctive relief at (ECF No. 65). The parties had until September 5, 2014 to file
Objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the
Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation as the
Opinion of the Court and accepts Magistrate Judge Eddy’s recommendation.
Accordingly,
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2014, Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive
Relief (ECF No. 65) is HEREBY DENIED.

/s/ Joy Flowers Conti
Joy Flowers Conti
United States District Judge

cc: all ECF registered counsel