CAMPBELL v. COLVIN

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM & ORDER OF COURT. No later than 2/21/14 plaintiff shall either provide proof of service of complaint and summons on defendant or provide, in writing, good cause for not yet having effectuated service. Should plaintiff fail to provide proof of service, or to establish good cause, by 2/21/14, this civil action will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). See Memorandum and Order of Court for further details. Signed by Judge Gustave Diamond on 2/10/14. (gpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN DAVID CAMPBELL I v. Civil Action No. 13-683 CAROLYN W. COLVIN ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY I MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF COURT On May 15 1 2013 1 John David Campbell ("plaintiff U ), proceeding in forma pauperis, filed a Complaint against defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, for review of a final decision denying his application for social security disability benefits and supplemental security income. The following daYI the Clerk of Court for this district issued summons to be served on defendant and on the Office of the United States Attorney for this district. Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a summons be served with a copy of the complaint and provides that the "plaintiff is responsible for having the summons and complaint served within the time allowed by Rule 4(m).n Rule 4(m) In turn l requires that a defendant be served "within 120 days after the complaint is filed. 1I Rule 4{1} dictates that proof of service must be made to the court. The period allowed for plaintiff to serve the summons and complaint expired on September 13 1 2013, which was 120-days after the filing of the complaint on May 15 ~A072 (Rev. 8/82) 1 2013. As of the date of this order, nearly 5 months after the expiration of the allowable time, the record contains no proof that service has been made. Rule 4{m) provides that if a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court, either on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff, must dismiss the action without prejudice or order that service be made within a specified time. the failure, However, if the plaintiff shows good cause for the court must extend the time for service for "an appropriate period. 1I Accordingly, the court will enter an order that, than February 21, 2014, no later plaintiff must either provide proof of service of the summons and complaint or provide, in writing, good cause for not yet having effectuated service. established the court bri If good cause is will extend the time for service. If proof of service is not made to the court by February 21, 2014, or good cause is not established, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. 1 An appropriate order follows. Dated: -i~ M(dP,/ .~ ~ Gustave Diamond United States District Judge 1 If plaintiff no longer intends to pursue this action, he also may file a notice of voluntary dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a) (1) (A) at any time prior to February 21, 2014. 2 'Il<AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN DAVID CAMPBELL, v. Civil Action No. 13-683 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this IO~ay of February, 2014, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure, IT IS ORDERED that no later than February 21, 2014, plaintiff John David Campbell shall either provide proof of service on defendant of the summons and complaint in this civil action or provide, in writing, good cause for not yet having effectuated service. Should plaintiff fail to provide proof of service, or to establish good cause, by February 21, 2014, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. ~~ - GUStaVei)ic;mond United States District Judge cc: Mark S. Galper, Esq. Bergstein & Galper 409 Schoonmaker Avenue P.O. Box A Monessen, PA 15062 3 ~A072 (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?