DUNSON v. ASTRUE

Filing 23

MEMORANDUM ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (see Docs. 15 & 18 ) is DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21 ) is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/21/14. (dcd) Staff note: a copy of this Memorandum Order has been sent, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to Plaintiff's address of record.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARMEN D. DUNSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 13-750 Judge Cathy Bissoon Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly MEMORANDUM ORDER This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On June 11, 2014, the magistrate judge issued a Report (Doc. 21) recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (see Docs. 15 & 18) be denied, and that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) be granted. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and Plaintiff timely has filed Objections. See Doc. 22. After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (see Docs. 15 & 18) is DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 11, 2014 is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 21, 2014 s\Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All counsel of record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): Carmen D. Dunson 712 Mellon Street Pittsburgh, PA 15206 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?