CONFLUENCE STRATEGY PARTNERS, LLC v. CARDELL CABINETRY, LLC

Filing 9

ORDER. Consistent with Defendant's filing at Doc. 8 , the Court has confirmed that Defendant has been placed into involuntary bankruptcy under § 303(b) of Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. See In re Cardell Cabinetry, LLC, 13-53117-cag (W.D. Tex. Bankr. (San Antonio Div.)). Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, the claims against Defendant are STAYED, and this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/18/13. (dcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONFLUENCE STRATEGY PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CARDELL CABINETRY, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 13-1333 Judge Cathy Bissoon ORDER Consistent with Defendant’s filing at Docket Number 8, the Court has confirmed that Defendant has been placed into involuntary bankruptcy under § 303(b) of Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. See In re Cardell Cabinetry, LLC, 13-53117-cag (W.D. Tex. Bankr. (San Antonio Div.)). Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, the claims against Defendant are STAYED,1 and this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Lehman v. Revolution Portfolio L.L.C., 166 F.3d 389, 392 & n.3 (1st Cir. 1999) (“[w]e endorse the judicious use of administrative closings by district courts . . . . to await the lifting of the automatic stay imposed by the Bankruptcy Code”); accord Penn West Assocs., Inc. v. Cohen, 371 F.3d 118, 128 (3d Cir. 2004) (citing with approval rationale in Lehman). Involuntary bankruptcy triggers the automatic stay. Interpool, Ltd. v. Certain Freights of M/VS Venture Star, 878 F.2d 111, 112 n.4 (3d Cir. 1989); accord Interbusiness Bank, N.A. v. First Nat’l Bank of Mifflintown, 328 F. Supp.2d 522, 524 (M.D. Pa. 2004). 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. November 18, 2013 s\Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?