ROBINSON v. ROZUM et al

Filing 30

ORDER re 25 Order on Motion for Discovery, 28 Objections filed by JEROME ROBINSON. As stated more fully in the Memorandum Order, Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 28 ) are OVERRULED, and the Memorandum Order of Judge Kelly dated May 6, 2015 (Doc. 25 ) is AFFIRMED.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/11/15. (rld) Staff Note: A copy of the Memorandum Order was mailed to Petitioner at his address of record via First Class U.S. Mail.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEROME ROBINSON,
Petitioner,
v.
GERALD ROZUM, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 13-1406
Judge Cathy Bissoon
Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly

MEMORANDUM ORDER
Magistrate Judge Kelly’s Memorandum Order dated May 6, 2015 (Doc. 25) is a nondispositive ruling. See Monroe v. Ohio State Penitentiary, 2012 WL 4342890, *1 (S.D. Ohio
Sept. 21, 2012) (holding same regarding motion for discovery in habeas case). Having carefully
reviewed Judge Kelly’s decision, and Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 28) thereto, the Court
concludes that the May 6th Memorandum Order was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to
law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (reciting standards of review governing magistrate judges’ nondispositive rulings). Accordingly, Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 28) are OVERRULED, and the
Memorandum Order of Judge Kelly dated May 6, 2015 (Doc. 25) is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

June 11, 2015

cc (via First-Class U.S. mail):
Jerome Robinson
JS-3150
S.C.I. Somerset
1600 Walters Mill Road
Somerset, PA 15510

s\Cathy Bissoon
Cathy Bissoon
United States District Judge

cc (via ECF email notification):
All Counsel of Record

2