HILL v. BARNACLE et al

Filing 45

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 40 , which is adopted as the opinion of this Court; that defendants' motion to dismiss 34 is granted; that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order she must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/28/15. (jg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONNA M. HILL, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES BARNACLE, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 13-1604 Judge Fischer Magistrate Judge Mitchell ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 2015, after the plaintiff, Donna M. Hill, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion to dismiss was submitted by the defendants, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the Objections (ECF No. 43) and Amended Objections (ECF No. 44) filed by the plaintiff, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 40), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 34) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order she must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. s/Nora Barry Fischer United States District Judge cc: Donna M. Hill 348 Country Club Road Apt. 2 Washington, PA 15301-2712 (regular and certified mail)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?