TUTTLE v. WINGARD, et al
Filing
73
ORDER. The Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Allegheny County (Doc. 70 ) is DENIED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 29, 2015 (Doc. 72 ) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/21/16. (rld)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GREGORY TUTTLE, et.al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
)
CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, )
et.al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
Civil Action No. 14-164
Judge Cathy Bissoon
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial
proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and
Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.
On December 29, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 72) recommending
that Allegheny County’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 70) be denied. Service of the Report and
Recommendation was made on the parties, and no objections have been filed.
After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and
Recommendation, the following Order is entered:
The Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Allegheny County (Doc. 70) is DENIED.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated December 29, 2015, hereby
is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 21, 2016
s\Cathy Bissoon
Cathy Bissoon
United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification):
All counsel of record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?