MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. PREFERRED FIRE PROTECTION, INC.
Filing
60
ORDER granting plaintiff's 40 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendant's tort-based affirmative defenses numbered 13 and 14 are dismissed. Further denying defendant's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment and adopting 55 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mitchell as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/2/16. (njt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO., a/s/o
IMAMIA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:14cv245
Electronic Mail
PREFERRED FIRE PROTECTION, INC., )
Defendant.
)
ORDER OF COURT
Plaintiff, Maryland Casualty Company, commenced this action on February 24, 2014.
[ECF No. 1]. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell for
pretrial proceedings in accordance with Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l) and Local
Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 55] filed on January 28,
2016, recommended that Plaintiff Maryland Casualty Company's Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment be granted and that Defendant Preferred Fire Protection, Inc.'s Motion for Summary
Judgment be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on all counsel of
record on that date. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges
Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local Rule of Court 72.D.2, they had until February
11, 2016 to file any written objections, and fourteen days after service of such objections to
respond thereto.
On February 22, 2016, Preferred Fire Protection, Inc. filed objections. ECF No. 56]. On
February 22, 2016, Maryland Casualty Company filed its objections. [ECF No. 59].
After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in this case, together with the
Report and Recommendation, and objections thereto, the following order is entered:
AND NOW this
,r(
Th~
). - day of"'
, 2016,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff Maryland Casualty Company's Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. 40] is GRANTED.
Defendant's tort-based affirmative
defenses numbered 13 and 14 are hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's, Preferred Fire Protection Inc.'s Motion
for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 44] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Robert C. Mitchell is hereby adopted as the Opinion ofthe District Court.
David Stewart Cercone
United States District Judge
cc:
Honorable Robert C. Mitchell
Steven L. Smith, Esquire
Ashley N. Rodger, Esquire
Joseph L. Orszulak, II, Esquire
Mark P. Merlini, Jr., Esquire
(Via CMJECF electronic filing)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?