BROWN v. SKLAR - MARKIND et al

Filing 29

ORDER denying 27 Motion to Enforce. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 2/5/2015. (MJL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS MICHAEL BROWN, an individual; on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) v. ) ) SKLAR - MARKIND a/k/a MARKIND ) LAW GROUP, P.C. a/k/a LAW OFFICES ) OF ANDREW SKLAR, P.C., ANDREW ) SKLAR, individually and in his official ) capacity, LLOYD MARKIND, individually ) and in his official capacity, JORDAN W. ) FELZER, individually and in his official ) capacity, and JOHN AND JANE DOES ) NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 25, ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 14-0266 United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff Thomas Brown’s Motion to Enforce November 7, 2014 Order of Court (ECF No. 27) and defendants’ response thereto, the Court will DENY the motion. Defendants do not dispute that Plaintiff’s claim belongs in arbitration and that Defendants are responsible for filing fees and expenses in excess of $125.00, nor do they challenge Plaintiff’s choice of the American Arbitration Association as the appropriate organization to conduct the arbitration. Defendants correctly assert, however, that it is Plaintiff’s responsibility, as the moving party who initially brought suit in this Court, to initiate any arbitration proceedings in accordance with the terms of the arbitration agreement. By the Court: s/Cynthia Reed Eddy Cynthia Reed Eddy United States Magistrate Judge cc: all counsel of record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?