MILLER v. EEOC

Filing 9

ORDER. It is ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(ii). Magistrate Judge Mitchell's 6 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 4/25/14. (bdb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DUANE MILLER,
Plaintiff,

)

)
)
)
)
)
)

vs.
EEOC Pittsburgh Area Office,
Defendant.

Civil Action No. 14-347

ORDER

~

AND NOW, thisdS day of April, 2014, after the

plaintift~ Duane Miller, filed an

action in the above-captioned case, after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United
States Magistrate Judge granting the plaintiff a period of time after being served with a copy to
file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiff and
upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No.6), which
is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(ii).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty
(30) days by filing a notice of appeal as prOV~L: _ __
_

Mark R. Hornak
United States District Judge

cc:

Duane Miller

#8 Sharon Court

Pittsburgh, PA 15235