WORK v. EXCELA HEALTH
Filing
31
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Compel. Defendant shall produce the documents and things Requested in Plaintiff's Second Request for Production of Documents Number 1 (a), (b), (c) and (d), and also will provide answers to Plaintiff's Interrogatory No.1 of her Second Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 11/13/14. (bfm )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL WORK, ADMINISTRATOR)
FOR THE ESTATE OF HEATHER
)
ELLEN WORK,
)
)
Plaintiff
)
vs.
) Civil No. 14-398
)
EXCELA HEALTH, t/dlh/a
)
FRICK HOSPITAL,
)
)
De&ndant
)
ORDER
And now, this 13 th day of November, 2014, the Court having reviewed the video
segment in question at http.:/Iwww.excelahealth.org/newsroomlvideo-gallery.aspx.itis hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiffs discovery requests are reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence such that Defendant's objections to
Plaintiffs discovery requests are OVERRULED and Plaintiffs Motion to Compel is
GRANTED.
It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant will fully
and completely produce the documents and things Requested in Plaintiffs Second Request for
Production of Documents Number 1(a), (b), (c) and (d), and also will fully and completely
provide answers to Plaintiffs Interrogatory No.1 of her Second Interrogatories and Request for
Production of Documents within 10 days of the date of this Order.
--u-(~ c& (b'4e~ ~
Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.
Senior United States District Judge
-- - ---
---
- - - - -
---
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?