HARRIS v. VITRAN EXPRESS, INC. et al

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING Report and Recommendations re 29 as the Opinion of the Court; DENYING 12 Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11/6/14. (lck)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DARRELL HARRIS,
Plaintiff,

V.

VITRAN EXPRESS, INC., VITRAN
EXPRESS CANADA, INC., VITRAN
CORPORATION, INC., DATA
PROCESSING, LLC, HR-1 CORPORATION
and CT TRANSPORT, INC. a/k/a CENTRAL
TRANSPORT, INC.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 14-0704
United States District Judge
Arthur J. Schwab
United States Magistrate Judge
Cynthia Reed Eddy

Order Adopting Report And Recommendation

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. no.
29) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action filed by Plaintiff (doc. no. 12) be
denied. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by November 3, 2014. No
objections were filed. The matter is ripe for disposition.
The district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to
which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C); see also Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d
874, 877 (3d Cir.1987). This Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the
findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The district court judge may also
receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions
AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED
AND DECREED as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is ADOPTED as

the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action (ECF

No. 12) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED this 61h day ofNovember, 2014

s/ Arthur J. Schwab
Arthur J. Schwab
United States District Judge

cc:

All Registered ECF Counsel and Parties