HARRIS v. VITRAN EXPRESS, INC. et al

Filing 76

ORDER GRANTING re 65 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by VITRAN CORPORATION, INC., VITRAN EXPRESS, INC., DATA PROCESSING, LLC, HR-1, CORPORATION, CT TRANSPORT, INC., VITRAN EXPRESS CANADA, INC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 3/31/2016. (ajt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARRELL HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. VITRAN EXPRESS, INC., VITRAN EXPRESS CANADA, INC., VITRAN CORPORATION, INC., DATA PROCESSING, LLC, HR-1 CORPORATION and CT TRANSPORT, INC. a/k/a CENTRAL TRANSPORT, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 14-0704 United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 65], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s breach of contract claim against HR-1 Corporation and Central Transport, Inc.; (2) Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s Wage Payment and Collection Law, 43 P.S. §§ 260.1, et seq. against HR-1 Corporation and Central Transport, Inc.; and (3) Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against Defendants Data Processing, LLC, HR-1 Corporation and Central Transport, Inc. By the Court: s/ Cynthia Reed Eddy Cynthia Reed Eddy United States Magistrate Judge cc: all registered counsel via CM-ECF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?