SMITH v. KERESTES et al

Filing 28

ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendations. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, the Petition of Clinton J. Smith for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, dated May 16, 2017 (Doc. 27 ), hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/9/2017. (kg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLINTON J. SMITH, Petitioner, v. JOHN KERESTES, et. al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 14-714 Judge Cathy Bissoon Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72. On May 16, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 27) recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and the certificate of appealability, be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and no objections have been filed. After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered: The Petition of Clinton J. Smith for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, dated May 16, 2017, hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 9, 2017 s/Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All counsel of record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): CLINTON J. SMITH JM-8630 SCI: MAHANOY 301 MOREA RD FRACKVILLE, PA 17932 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?