COFFER v. CAPOZZI et al
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JEFFERY ALAN COFFER. It is hereby ordered that the Petition (ECF No. 4) is dismissed as moot. It is further ordered that a Certificate of Appealability is denied. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court mark this case closed. And it is further ordered that if Petitioner wishes to appeal he must file a notice of appeal within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on May 4, 2016. (kcc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JEFFERY ALAN COFFER,
Petitioner,
v.
MARK V. CAPOZI, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 14 – 749
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241
filed by Petitioner, Timothy P. Storms (“Petitioner”). (ECF No. 4.) Petitioner claims that he was
denied parole in violation of his due process and equal protection rights. However, for the
reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s application for federal habeas corpus relief will be dismissed
as moot as he was released on parole on December 11, 2014.
By way of background, on March 10, 2011, Petitioner was sentenced to concurrent terms
of 2 to 4 years incarceration in Fayette County Case Nos. CP-26-CR-229-2010 and CP-26-CR318-2010. (Resp’t Ex. 1; ECF No. 11-1 at pp.4-14.) On July 5, 2011, Petitioner was committed
to a state correctional institution to serve the sentences in those cases. (Resp’t Ex. 2; ECF No.
11-1 at pp.16-17.) On July 19, 2011, the minimum and maximum sentences were established as
March 10, 2013 and March 10, 2015, respectively. (Resp’t Ex. 3; ECF No. 11-1 at pp.19-21.)
1
Petitioner was refused parole on December 5, 2012; June 7, 2013; and May 5, 2014. (Resp’t
Exs. 4, 5, 6; ECF Nos. 11-1 at pp.23-24, 26-27, 29-30.)
At this time, this Court takes judicial notice that Petitioner was released on parole on
December 11, 2014, and because Petitioner has been released from custody, his Petition is now
moot.
Generally, a petition for habeas corpus relief becomes moot when a prisoner is released
from custody before the court has addressed the merits of the petition. Lane v. Williams, 455
U.S. 624 (1982). The general principle derives from the case or controversy requirement of
Article III of the U.S. Constitution. “This case-or-controversy requirement subsists through all
stages of federal judicial proceedings, trial and appellate ... the parties must continue to have a
personal stake in the outcome of the lawsuit.” Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472,
477-78 (1990). In other words, “throughout the litigation, the plaintiff must have suffered, or be
threatened with, an actual injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed by a
favorable judicial decision.” Id. at 477. See also Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1 (1998); Maleng
v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 491-492 (1989) (habeas petitioner does not remain “in custody” under
conviction after the sentence imposed has fully expired merely because of possibility that prior
conviction will be used to enhance sentences imposed for any subsequent crimes of which he is
convicted); United States v. Romera-Vilca, 850 F.2d 177, 179 (3d Cir.1988) (prisoner’s motion
to vacate his conviction was not mooted when he was released from custody, where he faced
potential deportation as a collateral consequence of conviction).
Through the mere passage of time, Petitioner has obtained the requested relief, to be
paroled. In these circumstances, there is no case or controversy for this Court to consider and
2
there is no further relief for the Court to grant. Consequently, the Petition will be dismissed as
moot. A separate Order will issue.
Dated: May 4, 2016.
_________________________
Lisa Pupo Lenihan
United States Magistrate Judge
cc: Jeffery Alan Coffer
6260 Heverly Blvd.
Coalport, PA 16627
Counsel of record
Via ECF electronic mail
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JEFFERY ALAN COFFER,
Petitioner,
v.
MARK V. CAPOZI, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 14 – 749
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2016, and in accordance with the Court’s
Memorandum Opinion,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 4) is
dismissed as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case closed.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure, if Petitioner wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as
provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court,
at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days.
______________________
Lisa Pupo Lenihan
United States Magistrate Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?