HUGHES v. RICE

Filing 9

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. This case is referred to Mediation. Harry Paras, Esquire is appointed to serve as the mediator. Compensation of the neutral will be as follows: 50 % by Plaintiff and 50 % by Defendan t. The ADR conference(s) shall be concluded before February 10, 2015 unless extended by order of the Court. The ADR conferences may be conducted at any location agreed to by the parties, counsel, and the assigned neutral. George Farneth II, counsel for Plaintiff, is designated as lead counsel and shall be responsible for working with the parties and the neutral to coordinate an agreeable date, time and location for the initial ADR conference. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 11/10/14. (bfm )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA QUINTIN E. HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY RICE, JR., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 14-961-MBC ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION After due consideration of the issues and in consultation with the parties, the Court finds that this case is appropriate for referral to an alternative form of dispute resolution as provided by the local rules of this Court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (a) Referral to ADR: This case is referred to Mediation. Harry Paras, Esquire is appointed to serve as the mediator. Compensation of the neutral will be as follows: 50 % by Plaintiff and 50 % by Defendant. (b) Conduct of ADR Conference(s): The ADR conference(s) shall be conducted in accordance with Local Rule 16.2 and the Court’s ADR Policies and Procedures. (c) Scheduling ADR Conference(s): The ADR conference(s) shall be concluded before February 10, 2015 unless extended by order of the Court. The ADR conferences may be conducted at any location agreed to by the parties, counsel, and the assigned neutral. (d) Designation of Lead Counsel: George Farneth II, counsel for Plaintiff, is designated as lead counsel and shall be responsible for working with the parties and the neutral to coordinate an agreeable date, time and location for the initial ADR conference. If the parties are utilizing a private process, the case is still governed by the Court’s Local Rules and ADR Policies and Procedures. When private processes are used, it is the responsibility of counsel to ensure that all of the proper forms are timely submitted and filed, as required by Policies and Procedures. The parties are hereby notified that any individual neutral (Court approved or private) is required to become a registered user of the Electronic Case Filing System (ECF) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Counsel shall so notify their agreed upon neutral and refer them to the Court’s website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov for user registration forms. Counsel shall confirm to the Court that the selected neutral has completed the process. Nothing in this order alters the Case Management Order previously entered in this case. All deadlines set forth in that Case Management Order remain in full force and effect. SO ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2014.                                                  /s Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. ______          Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.  Senior United States District Judge 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?