GABRIEL v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al

Filing 28

ORDER adopting as the opinion of the court 24 Report and Recommendations as supplemented by the accompanying memorandum opinion; denying 3 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/12/2014. (smc )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW M. GABRIEL on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., MARCKISOTTO MARKETS INC. doing business as "EDGEWOOD GIANT EAGLE" or doing business as "GIANT EAGLE" or doing business as "GIANT EAGLE PHARMACY #24", SHAKESPEARE STREET ASSOCIATES GP LLC, doing business as "GIANT EAGLE" or doing business as "SHAKESPEARE GIANT EAGLE" or doing business as "GIANT EAGLE PHARMACY #17" and CVS PHARMACY, INC., doing business as "CVS" or doing business as "CVS STORE #4091" Defendants. Civil Action No. 14-0980 Chief United States District Judge Joy Flowers Conti United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, plaintiff’s motion to remand to state court (ECF No. 3) is DENIED, and his objections to the report and recommendation (ECF No. 25) are OVERRULED. 1 It is further ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 24), as supplemented by the accompanying memorandum opinion, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. It is further ORDERED that the matter is remanded back to the magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. BY THE COURT: Dated: December 12, 2014 /s/ Joy Flowers Conti Joy Flowers Conti Chief, United States District Judge cc: all counsel of record via CM-ECF 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?