DOUGLAS v. HARPER et al
Filing
11
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation as Opinion of the Court re 10 Report and Recommendation. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 3/10/15. (bfm )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICKY DOUGLAS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORLANDO L. HARPER Warden;
DEPUTY WARDEN ENRICK; C/0
BOZACK; C/0 YOUNG; C/0 ZOLLER,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 14-1266
Judge Maurice B. Cohill/
Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
ORDER
AND NOW, this lOth day of March, 2015, after Plaintiff, Ricky Douglas, filed an action
in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United
States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until March 6, 2015 to file written objections thereto,
and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon
consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the
opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint, ECF No.7, is dismissed for failure to
prosecute.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as
provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court,
1
at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days.
By the Court:
i\lallri(;e B. Cohill, Jr.
Senior United States District Judge
cc:
Honorable Maureen P. Kelly
ChiefUnited States Magistrate Judge
Ricky Douglas
164550
Allegheny County Jail
950 Second A venue
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?