DOUGLAS v. HARPER et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation as Opinion of the Court re 10 Report and Recommendation. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 3/10/15. (bfm )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RICKY DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, vs. ORLANDO L. HARPER Warden; DEPUTY WARDEN ENRICK; C/0 BOZACK; C/0 YOUNG; C/0 ZOLLER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 14-1266 Judge Maurice B. Cohill/ Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly ORDER AND NOW, this lOth day of March, 2015, after Plaintiff, Ricky Douglas, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until March 6, 2015 to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint, ECF No.7, is dismissed for failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, 1 at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days. By the Court: i\lallri(;e B. Cohill, Jr. Senior United States District Judge cc: Honorable Maureen P. Kelly ChiefUnited States Magistrate Judge Ricky Douglas 164550 Allegheny County Jail 950 Second A venue Pittsburgh, PA 15219 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?