RAIBLE v. UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING 6 Motion to Remand to State Court; ADOPTING Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 2/20/15. (lck)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RUTH M. RAIBLE,
Plaintiff,
V.
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-1307
United States District Judge
Arthur J. Schwab
United States Magistrate Judge
Cynthia Reed Eddy
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 15)
recommending that the Motion to Remand to the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland
County, Pennsylvania filed by Plaintiff (doc. no. 6) be granted. Objections to the Report and
Recommendation were due by February 19, 2015. No objections were filed. The matter is ripe
for disposition.
The district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to
which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(C); see also Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d
874, 877 (3d Cir.1987). This Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the
findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The district court judge may also
receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions
AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED
AND DECREED as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 15) is ADOPTED as
the Opinion of the Court.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand to the Court of
Common Pleas of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania (doc. no. 6) is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED this 201h day of February, 2015
~
United States District Judge
cc: all Registered ECF Counsel
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?