MEGELA v. CAPOZZA et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 7 Motion for Discovery albeit without prejudice to being refiled but only afte the Answer has been filed. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11-5-2014. A copy of the Order together with this Notice of Electronic Filing are being mailed to Petitioner at his address of record via first class mail. (tmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRADLEY A. MEGELA, Petitioner, vs. MARK CAPOZZA Superintendent S.C.I. Pittsburgh; LLOYD A. WHITE Chairman, PA Bd. of Prob. And Parole; KATHLEEN KANE The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 14-1335 Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly Re: ECF No. 7 ORDER Bradley A. Megela (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner who has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the two most recent denials of his re-parole application. He has also filed a Motion for Discovery. ECF No. 7. The Motion For Discovery is denied as being pre-maturely filed as the Petition has not been served yet nor has an Answer been filed. The denial of the Motion For Discovery is without prejudice to being filed again but only after the Answer has been filed. In accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rule 72.C.2 of the Local Rules of Court, the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to file an appeal to the District Judge which includes the basis for objection to this Order. Any appeal is to be submitted to the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. Failure to file a timely appeal will constitute a waiver of any appellate rights. s/Maureen P. Kelly MAUREEN P. KELLY CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Date: November 5, 2014 cc: Bradley A. Megela GQ-1195 S.C.I. Pittsburgh P.O. Box 99991 Pittsburgh, PA 15233-0991

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?