BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BOILERMAKERS LODGE 154 RETIREMENT PLAN et al v. ADAMS et al

Filing 25

ORDER that having been advised that the case has been settled, the Clerk of Court shall mark the CASE CLOSED, that nothing contained in this Order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action, and, that should further proceedings the rein become necessary or desirable, either party may initiatethem in the same manner as if the Order had not been entered, and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court expressly retains jurisdiction in this matter toconsider any issue arising during the period when settlement is being finalized, including, but not limited to, enforcing settlement. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 4/16/15. (bfm )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
BOILERMAKERS LODGE 154
RETIREMENT PLAN AND
BOILERMAKERS LODGE 154
WELFARE PLAN,
Plaintiffs,

v.
ROBIN M. ADAMS, individually and as
Parent of J.A. ADAMS, a minor,
JOSHUA JAY ADAMS, JUSTIN T.
ADAMS, and J.A. ADAM, individually
And as beneficiaries of the estate of JAY
S. ADAMS, deceased; LINDA L.
ADAMS; JESSICA DAWN ADAMS,
individually and as parent of J. C.
ADAMS, a minor,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil No. 14-1338

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER
AND NOW this 16th day of April, 2015, the Court having been advised that the above
captioned case has been settled and that the only matters remaining to be completed are the
payment of the settlement proceeds, if any, and the submission of a stipulation for dismissal
under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a), and, it appearing that there is no further action required by the court at
this time,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk mark the above-captioned case closed; that
nothing contained in this Order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action, and,
that should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable, either party may initiate
them in the same manner as if the Order had not been entered, and,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court expressly retains jurisdiction in this matter to
consider any issue arising during the period when settlement is being finalized, including, but not
limited to, enforcing settlement.

~~.U·;_ ~

es a:.u -~·

Maunce B. Cohill, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2