BARCLAY v. SOKOL et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8 ). Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, which was converted into a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 2 ), is GRANTED for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 8/18/2015. (sje)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VIRGIL BARCLAY, Plaintiff, v. KAREN SOKOL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 15-253 Judge Cathy Bissoon Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72. On July 28, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2), which was converted into a Motion for Summary Judgment as to the issue of exhaustion (Doc. 4), be granted for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and no objections have been filed. After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which was converted into a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 2) is GRANTED for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated July 28, 2015, is adopted as the opinion of the District Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. August 18, 2015 s\Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): Virgil Barclay BM-9109 175 Progress Drive Waynesburg, PA 15370 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?