GONZALEZ v. COLEMAN

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM ORDER. The Petition of Carmelo Gonzalez for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, dated February 4, 2016, (Doc. 4 ) is hereby adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/2/16. (jwr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL, CARMELO GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. BRIAN COLEMAN, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 15-336 Judge Cathy Bissoon Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly MEMORANDUM ORDER This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72. On February 4, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 4) recommending that the petition be dismissed pre-service because it challenges Petitioner’s conditions of confinement and a certificate of appealability should be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and no objections have been filed. After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered: The Petition of Carmelo Gonzalez for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, dated February 4, 2016, hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 2, 2016 s\Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All counsel of record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): Carmelo Gonzalez JF-2059 SCI Fayette Box 9999 LaBelle, PA 15450-0999 Carmelo Gonzalez JF-2059 175 Progress Drive (inmates) Waynesburg, PA 15370 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?