SHAY v. GILMORE et al

Filing 14

ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to the Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. It is further ORDERED that 10 Motion to Dismiss is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT. Magistrate Judge Lenihan's 13 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 8/12/15. (bdb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN SHAY, Plaintiff, VS. WARDEN GILMORE, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 15-671 Judge Mark R. Hornak/ Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan ORDER AND NOW, this ~ lL.:.a-ay of August, 2015, after the Plaintiff filed an action in the above- captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving Plaintiff until August 3, 2015, to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in that Report and Recommendation, this case is dismissed without prejudice due to the Plaintiffs failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) is dismissed without prejudice as moot. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case closed. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(l) ofthe Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if Plaintiff wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 152 within thirty (30) days. MARK R. HORNAK United States District Judge cc: Honorable Lisa Pupo Lenihan United States Magistrate Judge Kevin Shay LH1546 175 Progress Dr. Waynesburg, PA 15370 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?