DICIO v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA et al

Filing 95

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 88 ; that defendants' motion for summary judgment 75 is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 8/9/17. (jg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DAVID DICIO,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and SCOTT
PETERSON,
Defendants.

Civil Action No. 15-676
Judge Fischer
Magistrate Judge Mitchell

ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2017, after the plaintiff, David DiCio, filed
an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion for summary judgment was submitted
by the defendants, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Scott Peterson, and after a Report and
Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of
time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of
the objections filed by the defendants and the response to those objections filed by the plaintiff,
and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 88), which is adopted as the opinion
of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 75) is
denied.

s/Nora Barry Fischer
Nora Barry Fischer
United States District Judge