MILLIGAN v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
ORDER indicating that Defendants' motion to dismiss 83 is denied; that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan 98 is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/6/17. (jg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RAMON LASHAWN MILLIGAN,
RICH ANDRASCKIK, et al.,
C.A. No. 15-1195
This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 14, 2015, and
was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for report and
recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3
and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation, filed on May 18, 2017, recommended that Defendants’ motion to dismiss,
(Docket No. ), be denied.
Service was made on all parties by ECF. Objections to the report
and recommendation for ECF users were due by June 1, 2017, and objections to the report and
recommendation for unregistered ECF users were due by June 5, 2017. No objections were
filed. After de novo review of the Second Amended Complaint and documents in the case,
together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2017,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss, (Docket No.
[83), is denied.
The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, (Docket No. ),
is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
s/Nora Barry Fischer
NORA BARRY FISCHER
United States District Judge
cc/ecf: Lisa Pupo Lenihan
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Ramon Lashawn Milligan
89 Knox Avenue Apartment 11
Pittsburgh, PA 15210
All counsel of record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?