SMITH v. CAPOZZA et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendation as the Opinion of the court. Ordered that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed; a Certificate of Appealability is denied; and Pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Fed Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Rule of Appellate Procedure 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 30 days. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 12/7/15. (rtw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LA VON CECIL SMITH, EZ-5402, Petitioner, ) ) ) ) V. 2:15-cv-1449 ) ) ) MS. KATHLEEN KANE, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2015, after the petitioner, Lavon Cecil Smith, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, Petitioner's objections (ECF No. 5) having been considered and rejected as meritless, and upon independent review of the petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No.4), which is adopted as the opinion ofthis Court, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ ofhabeas corpus filed by petitioner (ECF No.3) is dismissed and, because reasonable jurists could not conclude that a basis for appeal exists, a certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(l) ofthe Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. United States District Judge cc: LA VON CECIL SMITH EZ-5402, FA-406 SCI Pittsburgh Post Office Box 99991 Pittsburgh, PA 15233

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?